Jonathan S. Masur is a Professor of Law at the University of Chicago Law School . His scholarship bridges Patent Law , Intellectual Property , and Law and Economics , focusing on how legal frameworks interact with innovation, regulatory policy, and empirical legal studies. He has co-authored influential works on the social cost of carbon , AI in legal education , and patent licensing , often collaborating with scholars like Lisa Larrimore Ouellette and Amy R. Motomura. His recent articles, including Can AI Hold Office Hours? (2025) and Disclosures Puzzles in Patent Law (2025), explore generative AI , legal pedagogy , and patent system efficiency . He has contributed to debates on cost-benefit analysis in regulatory contexts, such as Climate Regulation and the Limits of Cost-Benefit Analysis (2011) and Chevronizing Around Cost-Benefit Analysis (2025).
Michael Rappaport is the Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law and Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego. He has held prominent roles including work in the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel, appellate practice at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, and clerkship for Judge Dolores Sloviter of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. He teaches constitutional law and originalism, with affiliations at the Sorbonne and Bar-Ilan University. Education: JD (1985) and DCL (1990) from Yale Law School. His research focuses on constitutional law, originalism, administrative law, separation of powers, and federalism. He advocates for unifying original intent and public meaning in constitutional interpretation, and his work addresses judicial precedent, nondelegation doctrine, and the role of administrative courts. Recent publications emphasize constitutional adjudication, regulatory governance, and judicial review. Key themes include reconciling originalism with modern legal challenges, refining statutory interpretation frameworks, and analyzing executive power dynamics. Scientific Awards: Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law (2023). He founded the Originalism Blog and serves on The Federalist Society’s Administrative Law & Regulation Executive Committee, contributing to global academic discourse through teaching and writing.
Richard Murphy is the AT&T Professor of Law at Texas Tech University School of Law, where he has taught since 2009. His primary academic home is within the School of Law at Texas Tech University, where he holds a named professorship. Previously, Professor Murphy taught at William Mitchell College of Law starting in 2000, and has served as a visiting professor at the law schools of University of Idaho, Seton Hall, and Lewis & Clark. Professor Murphy received his B.A. from Carleton College in 1987, magna cum laude, and his J.D. from University of Minnesota Law School in 1995, summa cum laude. After law school, he clerked for Judge Stephen S. Trott of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, followed by work as a litigation associate at Dorsey & Whitney in Minneapolis. Professor Murphy's research focuses primarily on Administrative Law, with particular expertise in judicial deference doctrines, separation of powers, and the administrative state. He has developed specialized knowledge in areas including Chevron deference, unitary executive theory, and the judicial review of agency action. His scholarship often examines the relationship between constitutional principles and administrative governance, with notable contributions to understanding presidential control of agencies and the proper scope of judicial review. His publications demonstrate consistent scholarly engagement with evolving administrative law doctrines, particularly the Chevron framework and alternatives to traditional deference models. Professor Murphy's work shows an increasing focus on constitutional dimensions of administrative law, including due process concerns in national security contexts and the proper boundaries of presidential power over agencies. His scholarship bridges theoretical administrative law concepts with practical regulatory concerns. Co-author of Volumes 32 & 33 of Federal Practice & Procedure, Judicial Review of Administrative Action Co-editor of an administrative law casebook Co-author of Supreme Court News in Administrative and Regulatory Law News (ABA) Professor Murphy teaches Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Property, Antitrust, and Telecommunications Law. His scholarship and teaching reflect deep engagement with both doctrinal and theoretical aspects of administrative governance. While the available information doesn't specify particular advising relationships or grant funding, his extensive publication record and named professorship suggest significant scholarly impact within the administrative law community.
Jacob Gersen is the Sidley Austin Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and an Affiliate Professor in the Department of Government at Harvard University. He also directs the Food Law Lab, which focuses on legal aspects of food policy. He holds a Ph.D. in Political Science and J.D. from the University of Chicago, along with an A.B. in Public Policy from Brown University. His expertise spans administrative law, food law, regulation, arbitration, and constitutional theory. Education: J.D. (University of Chicago, 2004), Ph.D. Political Science (University of Chicago, 2001), M.A. Political Science (University of Chicago, 1998), A.B. Public Policy (Brown University, 1996). Research interests include administrative law frameworks, food policy regulation, campus sexual misconduct governance, and constitutional theory. Notable work explores delegation mechanisms in lawmaking and institutional design. Recent scholarship addresses academic freedom in universities and bureaucratic governance of sex-related policies. His articles often analyze intersections between legal structures and political dynamics, with frequent contributions to law reviews and policy journals. He advises on arbitration cases involving federal agencies and Title IX proceedings, and occasionally serves as legal counsel in disputes involving defamation and contract law. Led the Food Law Lab, which supports interdisciplinary research on food regulation. Teaches courses such as 'Rediscovering The Legal Process' and 'Torts' at Harvard Law School. His work bridges legal theory with practical regulatory challenges, emphasizing institutional accountability and administrative efficiency.
Michael P. Waxman is a Professor at Marquette University Law School, where he contributes scholarly analysis on constitutional law, antitrust, and regulatory issues. His work frequently engages with U.S. Supreme Court decisions, particularly in the areas of religious freedom, business regulation, and administrative law. Marquette University Law School, Professor His research interests include Constitutional Law, Antitrust Law, Business Regulation, U.S. Supreme Court Jurisprudence, and International Legal Practice. He has written extensively on the implications of key Supreme Court rulings, such as Hobby Lobby and American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League , focusing on statutory interpretation, agency power, and corporate legal structure. The available articles indicate a strong focus on the intersection of law and policy, particularly how courts and agencies interpret statutes in complex regulatory environments. His work spans doctrinal analysis in constitutional and antitrust law, with attention to practical implications for legal practitioners and regulatory bodies. Michael P. Waxman has not been mentioned as receiving specific scientific awards in the provided text. There is no information available regarding student advising, grants, or funding activities. Similarly, no details about laboratories, research teams, or collaborative projects are present in the provided content.
Cary Coglianese is the Edward B. Shils Professor of Law and Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania, where he serves as the founding Director of the Penn Program on Regulation. He is a prominent scholar specializing in administrative law and regulatory policy with over 30 years of academic experience. Coglianese is also a Senior Fellow of the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), an elected member of the American Law Institute, and a Fellow of the National Academy of Public Administration. His scholarly work focuses on empirical evaluation of regulatory processes, the role of public participation in policymaking, technology's impact on regulation, and business-government relations. Coglianese has authored more than 300 articles, book chapters, reports, and essays, with recent publications examining AI governance, climate change policy, and regulatory excellence. He has written influential books including Achieving Regulatory Excellence , Does Regulation Kill Jobs? , and Regulatory Breakdown: The Crisis of Confidence in U.S. Regulation . Coglianese has made significant contributions to regulatory education and practice. He founded and serves as faculty advisor for The Regulatory Review , a leading daily online publication on regulatory issues, and co-founded the international peer-reviewed journal Regulation & Governance . He previously served as Deputy Dean for Academic Affairs at Penn Law and teaches courses in administrative law, environmental law, regulatory law and policy, and policy analysis. He also directs Penn Law's executive education program on regulatory analysis and decision-making. Senior Fellow, Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) Elected member, American Law Institute Elected Fellow, National Academy of Public Administration Founding Director, Penn Program on Regulation Faculty Advisor, The Regulatory Review Founding Editor, Regulation & Governance journal Coglianese has extensive experience in regulatory policy outreach, having chaired committees for the Administrative Conference of the United States, the American Bar Association, and the National Academy of Sciences. His recent work includes serving on a National Academy of Sciences committee studying maritime regulation and providing feedback to the Office of Management and Budget on regulatory analysis guidelines. He has advised numerous government agencies including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. Department of Transportation, and international organizations like the OECD.
Nicholas J. Schroeck is the Dean and Professor of Law at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law. He specializes in environmental law, environmental justice, water law, and Great Lakes issues. Previously serving as Associate Dean for Experiential Education, he led clinical and externship programs, securing community partnerships. His scholarship includes over 100 publications and presentations addressing air/water pollution reduction, mass transportation advocacy, and citizen enforcement of environmental laws. Education: J.D. from Wayne State University (2007), B.A. from Elmhurst College (2002). Professional service includes roles with the Great Lakes Environmental Law Center and work during the Flint Water Crisis as a special assistant prosecutor. Awards include the 2024 Michigan State Bar Foundation Fellowship. Research emphasizes legal solutions for environmental challenges, with notable work on the Flint Water Crisis, Great Lakes governance, and urban agriculture. Teaches environmental law courses and launched Detroit Mercy’s environmental law clinic. Active in policy advocacy, presenting at conferences like the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Great Lakes Commission meetings.
John M. Barkett is a Lecturer at the University of Miami School of of Law, where he teaches courses on E-Discovery and Environmental Litigation . He is also a partner at the law firm of Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. in Miami, specializing in Commercial Litigation , Environmental Law , Toxic Torts , and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) such as arbitration and mediation. His research and practice focus on the intersection of Legal Ethics , E-Discovery , International Arbitration , and Environmental Dispute Resolution . He has authored influential works on topics such as the Roberts Court’s jurisprudence , Chevron Deference , Attorney-Client Privilege , and Ethical Challenges in Hybrid Work Environments . Notable Publications : E-Discovery: Twenty Questions and Answers (2008), The Ethics of E-Discovery (2009). Leadership Roles : Chaired the Miami International Arbitration Society Task Force on Expedited Arbitration (2019), served on the Federal Judicial Conference Advisory Committee for Civil Rules (2012-2018), and contributed to the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct . Scientific and Professional Awards include: Lawdragon Hall of Fame (2025) Lifetime Achievement Award, The Daily Business Review (2019) Chambers USA Band 1 in Environmental Law (2004-2025) The Best Lawyers in America (Arbitration, Commercial Litigation, Environmental Law, since 2005) Lawyer of the Year (2019, 2022, 2024, 2025) Mr. Barkett has served as a neutral in over $4 billion in arbitration cases , including roles as a Special Master for the Florida Everglades restoration (2003). His scientific contributions emphasize the ethical use of AI in law , cross-border e-discovery , and refinements to arbitration procedures .
Associate Professor Bassina Farbenblum is a legal scholar and advocate specializing in human rights, migrant worker rights, and clinical legal education. She holds positions at UNSW Law’s School of Global & Public Law and co-founded the Migrant Justice Institute, a global nonprofit. Her career spans roles as a litigator, clinical educator, and policy advisor, with a focus on addressing labor exploitation and access to justice for migrants. Farbenblum leads research on migrant labor rights in Australia, Asia, and the US, emphasizing systemic reforms and technology’s role in empowering workers. Education: B.Sc./LL.B. (UNSW), LL.M. (NYU). Research & Grants: Farbenblum has secured over $2M in grants for projects like ‘Wage Theft in Australia’ and ‘Transformative Technology for Migrant Workers.’ Her work includes pioneering the UNSW Human Rights Clinic (2009–2019) and advising governments on migrant labor policies. Awards: Includes the UNSW Law Faculty Award for Impact (2018) and an Open Society Foundations Fellowship (2014). Key Contributions: Advocated for visa protections for exploited migrant workers, analyzed wage theft prevalence, and developed frameworks for migrant recruitment governance. Her research bridges legal systems, technology, and human rights to combat exploitation.
Jonathan Remy Nash serves as the Robert Howell Hall Professor of Law at Emory University School of Law in Atlanta, Georgia. With an extensive scholarly record including 52 publications and significant impact in legal academia (ranked 11,737 in total papers downloads with 8,909 total downloads), Professor Nash has established himself as a prominent legal scholar with expertise spanning constitutional law, criminal procedure, federal courts, and administrative law. His work frequently appears in top-tier law journals including the Yale Law Journal, Virginia Law Review, and Northwestern University Law Review. Professor Nash's research interests demonstrate remarkable breadth and depth across multiple legal domains. His scholarship on constitutional law examines the unconstitutional conditions doctrine, standing doctrine, and federalism issues, while his criminal procedure work addresses prosecutorial discretion, bad faith prosecution, and the intersection of constitutional rights with criminal justice. In administrative law, he has made significant contributions to understanding Chevron deference, agency budgets, and regulatory production. His environmental law scholarship focuses on grandfathering provisions, transition relief, and pollution control mechanisms. Notably, Professor Nash frequently employs empirical methods to analyze judicial behavior, collegiality, and decision-making processes across various legal contexts. Analysis of Professor Nash's recent publications reveals a sophisticated interdisciplinary approach that bridges traditional doctrinal analysis with empirical and economic perspectives. His work increasingly examines the intersection of constitutional doctrine with practical enforcement mechanisms, particularly in criminal procedure and federal courts contexts. There's a clear trend toward examining how theoretical legal principles operate in real-world settings, with particular attention to vulnerable populations and the practical impacts of legal doctrines. His scholarship demonstrates consistent engagement with both foundational legal principles and emerging contemporary challenges in the legal system. Professor Nash has maintained a robust collaborative research agenda, frequently working with prominent scholars including Richard L. Revesz, Michael G. Collins, Kay L. Levine, Robert A. Schapiro, and Jonathan S. Masur. His research has been supported through institutional affiliations that provide the resources necessary for rigorous legal scholarship. While specific grant information isn't detailed in the available materials, his extensive publication record suggests sustained research support. Professor Nash maintains active engagement with the legal community through amicus brief submissions, including work on significant cases like Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court. His scholarship demonstrates consistent relevance to contemporary legal debates and judicial decision-making across multiple domains of law.
Eric C. Chaffee is the John C. Hutchins Professor of Law at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, where he also serves as Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Strategic Programs, Director of the Compliance Risk Management and Financial Integrity Institute, and Co-Director of the Center for Business Law. An elected member of the American Law Institute and Fellow of the American Bar Foundation, he is a leading scholar in business law, securities regulation, taxation, and the law of emerging technologies. Education Juris Doctor, University of Pennsylvania Law School Bachelor of Arts, The Ohio State University Research Interests Professor Chaffee’s scholarship is organized around three core pillars: The evolving governance of business organizations, with emphasis on choice-of-entity implications for purpose, fiduciary duties, and stakeholder accountability. The regulation of securities markets and investment vehicles, including the intersection of federal securities law with FinTech, cryptocurrencies, and virtual worlds. The integration of emerging technologies—artificial intelligence, blockchain, and data analytics—into legal compliance and transactional practice. Across these domains he employs interdisciplinary perspectives drawn from behavioral economics, corporate theory, and comparative regulation to advance both doctrinal understanding and practical reform. Publication Landscape Spanning more than two decades, his work has appeared in flagship journals such as the Boston College Law Review, Ohio State Law Journal, UC Davis Law Review, and Washington & Lee Law Review, as well as specialty publications at Stanford, NYU, Penn, and Michigan. The fifteen most recent articles (2017-2025) reveal intensifying focus on the Roberts Court’s securities jurisprudence, the regulatory challenges posed by cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance, and the theoretical underpinnings of the business trust. Professional Honors & Leadership Elected Member, American Law Institute Fellow, American Bar Foundation Chair, AALS Sections on Business Associations; Nonprofit & Philanthropy Law; Internet & Computer Law (past); Securities Regulation (past) Co-Founder & Executive Committee Member, National Business Law Scholars Conference Repeated service as Chair or Member on ABA accreditation site-visit teams Advising, Grants & Outreach As Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Strategic Programs, Professor Chaffee oversees all non-J.D. offerings, including the Compliance & Risk Management Program that reports 100 % job placement. He has previously served as Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development at two other institutions, curating workshop series, symposia, and extramural grant initiatives. He is regularly retained as an expert witness in high-stakes corporate litigation and provides board-level counsel to tax-exempt organizations. Laboratories & Teams He directs the Compliance Risk Management and Financial Integrity Institute , an interdisciplinary hub that partners with regulators, industry, and technologists to design compliance frameworks for financial institutions, FinTech start-ups, and multinational corporations.
Alan B. Morrison serves as the Lerner Family Associate Dean for Public Interest and Public Service Law and Professorial Lecturer in Law at George Washington University Law School. In his administrative role, he creates pro bono opportunities for students, brings public interest programs to the law school, encourages students to pursue careers in non-profit and government sectors, and assists with funding legal education for public service careers. Morrison's research spans Constitutional Law, Civil Procedure, and Administrative Law, with particular expertise in Supreme Court litigation and separation of powers issues. His career has focused on law reform litigation in areas including open government, legal profession regulation, agency compliance, consumer protection, and class action settlements. His scholarly work demonstrates consistent engagement with fundamental constitutional questions and procedural justice issues. His recent publications show a clear trend toward analyzing judicial philosophy in the Roberts Court, administrative agency authority, and the structural foundations of civil procedure. These works reflect his deep practical experience arguing 20 cases before the Supreme Court, including landmark victories in Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, and INS v. Chadha. President of American Academy of Appellate Lawyers (1999-2000) Morrison has taught civil procedure and constitutional law at GW Law and previously at Harvard, NYU, Stanford, Hawaii, and American University law schools. He maintains active engagement with the legal community through positions including elected member of the Board of Governors of the District of Columbia Bar, senior fellow of the Administrative Conference of the United States, member of the American Law Institute, and member of the Committee on Science, Technology & Law of the National Academy of Sciences. His current media commentary addresses contemporary issues like Trump's legal challenges and tariff policies.
Jonathan R. Siegel serves as Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development and holds the F. Elwood and Eleanor Davis Professor of Law position at The George Washington University Law School. Joining the law school in 1995, Professor Siegel has established himself as a prominent legal scholar with expertise spanning multiple areas of law. His professional background includes four years with the Appellate Staff, Civil Division, of the U.S. Department of Justice, where he briefed and argued appellate cases on behalf of the president and numerous government officials and agencies, following a clerkship with Chief Judge Patricia M. Wald of the District of Columbia Circuit. Professor Siegel's educational background includes: BA from Harvard University JD from Yale University Professor Siegel's research interests focus on civil procedure, federal jurisdiction, administrative law, and intellectual property. His scholarly work demonstrates deep engagement with constitutional interpretation, statutory construction methodologies, and the role of courts in reviewing administrative action. He has been particularly active in analyzing Chevron deference and textualist approaches to legal interpretation, as evidenced by his numerous publications and media commentary on these subjects. His work bridges theoretical legal scholarship with practical implications for how courts interpret statutes and regulations. An analysis of Professor Siegel's recent publications reveals consistent engagement with judicial interpretation frameworks, particularly examining textualism versus intentionalism in statutory construction. His scholarship frequently addresses the relationship between courts and administrative agencies, with significant focus on Chevron deference and its constitutional foundations. The trajectory of his work shows increasing attention to practical implications of legal interpretation methods in administrative contexts, while maintaining strong theoretical foundations in constitutional law and judicial review principles. Professor Siegel has been actively engaged in the legal community through media commentary and expert analysis. He has been quoted in major publications including The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and Associated Press on matters related to administrative law, statutory interpretation, and constitutional questions. His recent commentary has focused on the potential implications of the Supreme Court's pending ruling on the Chevron doctrine, EPA chemical rulemaking, and election integrity issues.
Christine Chabot is an Associate Professor of Law at Marquette University Law School, where she teaches Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Legislation, and a seminar on originalism titled "Litigating the Lessons of History." Her research centers on constitutional and administrative law, with a strong emphasis on agency independence, separation of powers, and the historical evolution of the administrative state. She is widely published in leading law journals and her scholarship has been cited by the U.S. Supreme Court. Her educational background includes a B.A. from Northwestern University and a J.D. earned magna cum laude from Notre Dame Law School. Prior to her academic career, she clerked for Judge Jane R. Roth of the U.S. Court of Appeals and practiced at national law firms. She previously served as Distinguished Professor in Residence at Loyola University Chicago School of Law and as Associate Director for Regulation at Loyola’s Institute for Consumer Antitrust Studies. Professor Chabot’s research focuses on challenging originalist and historical arguments for the unitary executive theory, exploring the constitutional foundations of independent agencies, and analyzing judicial behavior. Her work combines rigorous historical analysis with contemporary legal and regulatory issues, contributing significantly to debates on presidential power and administrative governance. The trends in her recent publications reveal a sustained scholarly engagement with constitutional originalism, the limits of executive authority, and the legitimacy of administrative agencies. Her articles frequently analyze founding-era practices, judicial decision-making, and regulatory frameworks, placing her at the forefront of current constitutional and administrative law discourse. Research cited by the United States Supreme Court Featured in The New York Times , Bloomberg Law , CNN , ABA Journal , The Atlantic , and The Economist Professor Chabot has advised and mentored law students through her teaching and seminar leadership. She has not received public grants mentioned in the text. She is actively involved in academic service, serving as an editor for the Journal of American Constitutional History and on the Executive Committee of the American Association of Law Schools Section for Administrative Law. Her teaching includes innovative seminars that bridge historical inquiry and legal advocacy. While no formal lab or research team is mentioned, her collaborative work (e.g., with Barry Sullivan) and editorial roles indicate active participation in scholarly networks focused on constitutional and administrative law. Her engagement with empirical methods and historical research suggests a multidisciplinary approach to legal scholarship.
Christopher Yoo is the Imasogie Professor in Law and Technology at the University of Pennsylvania, with affiliations at the Annenberg School for Communication and the School of Engineering and Applied Science. He directs the Center for Technology, Innovation & Competition and co-directs the Penn Center on Media, Technology & Democracy. Professor of Law, Carey Law School Professor of Communication, Annenberg School Professor of Computer and Information Science, Engineering School Founding Director, Center for Technology, Innovation & Competition Co-Director, Penn Center on Media, Technology & Democracy His research spans Law and Technology , focusing on Internet Regulation , Antitrust , and AI Policy . He examines technical determinants of Interoperability , Privacy and Security for critical systems, and Internet Governance frameworks. His recent publications analyze Global Internet Ecosystems , AI Regulation , and Antitrust Challenges for digital platforms. Trends include 5G/6G Policy , GDPR-AI Intersections , and Economic Modeling for connectivity. Scientific Awards : Cy Pres Award on Cloud Computing (2013), New York Bar Foundation Christopher Yoo actively advises on Grants for global connectivity and Testifies before U.S. Congress and international bodies. He contributes to Telemedicine , mHealth Projects , and Privacy Frameworks via participation in panels like the UN Internet Governance Forum .
