جست‌وجوی استاد و پژوهشگر

Jack M. Beermannمشاهده پروفایل

استاد

• Administrative Law
• Civil Rights
• Federal Courts
• +۱۲ مورد دیگر

Jack M. Beermann is the Philip S. Beck Professor of Law and Harry Elwood Warren Scholar at Boston University School of Law, where he has been a full-time faculty member since 1984. He teaches Administrative Law, Civil Rights Litigation, and Constitutional Law, and his scholarship has profoundly influenced debates on agency deference, presidential transitions, and civil rights enforcement. His educational background includes a BA with distinction from the University of Wisconsin and a JD with honors from the University of Chicago. He clerked for Judge Richard Cudahy on the Seventh Circuit before joining BU Law. Beermann’s research centers on administrative law, civil rights, and federal courts. He is a leading critic of the Chevron deference doctrine, advocating for a return to the Skidmore standard. His work spans topics such as midnight rulemaking, public pension crises, judicial review, and the constitutional law of presidential transitions. He has also contributed to reforms in Chinese administrative law through academic collaboration. His recent publications (2022–2025) reflect sustained scholarly engagement, particularly on the erosion of Chevron, major questions doctrine, and the future of the administrative state. These works appear in top journals and casebooks, demonstrating his continued influence in legal academia. Harry Elwood Warren Scholar Philip S. Beck Professor of Law Public Member, Administrative Conference of the United States (2017–present) Frequent media commentator on Supreme Court and administrative law Beermann has advised on policy through congressional testimony and ACUS participation. He has held visiting professorships at Harvard, DePaul, and institutions in Israel and China. He remains an active scholar and educator, with courses scheduled into 2026, confirming his ongoing academic role.

Jonathan B. Wienerمشاهده پروفایل

استاد

• Environmental Policy
• Public Policy
• Risk Regulation
• +۶ مورد دیگر

Jonathan B. Wiener is the William R. Perkins Distinguished Professor of Law at Duke Law School, Professor of Environmental Policy at the Nicholas School of the Environment, and Professor of Public Policy at the Sanford School of Public Policy at Duke University. He serves as Co-Director of the Duke Center on Risk in the Science & Society Initiative and holds affiliations with Resources for the Future (RFF), the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), Duke Kunshan University, and the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis. President, Society for Risk Analysis (2008) Co-Chair, SRA World Congress on Risk (2012) Founding Faculty Director, Duke Center for Environmental Solutions (2000-05) Co-Director, Rethinking Regulation Program (2015-19) His research focuses on comparative risk regulation , climate change policy , environmental economics , and international regulatory cooperation , with recent work on solar radiation modification governance , multirisk frameworks , and adaptive policy design . Key projects include the Duke Center on Risk and the Duke Rethinking Regulation initiative. Scientific awards include the Chauncey Starr Young Risk Analyst Award (SRA, 2003) Richard J. Burk Outstanding Service Award (SRA, 2014) University Fellow of Resources for the Future Senior Fellow of ACUS He has advised on climate treaties , international risk assessments , and regulatory reform , with grants from institutions like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and China Council for International Cooperation on Environment & Development . His work bridges law , policy , and decision sciences .

• Evidence Law
• Civil Procedure
• Trial Advocacy
• +۴ مورد دیگر

James J. Duane is a Professor at Regent Law School , part of Regent University. He has held visiting roles as Distinguished Visiting Professor at William and Mary Law School and served as a faculty associate at Harvard University’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society. His expertise spans Evidence Law, Civil Procedure, Trial Practice, and Appellate Advocacy, with over 30 scholarly articles and co-authorship of Weissenberger’s Federal Evidence . He has been recognized with multiple teaching and scholarship awards, including the Regent Faculty Excellence Awards and the Distinguished Faculty Achievement Award from Virginia’s Higher Education Council. Duane holds a J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School and an A.B. magna cum laude from Harvard College, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. His research focuses on evidentiary rules, procedural law, and legal advocacy. He has lectured nationally on topics such as hearsay exceptions, jury instructions, and constitutional rights, and has testified before the U.S. Judicial Conference’s Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules. His public advocacy includes a widely viewed YouTube talk advising against police interrogations for innocent suspects. Duane is also a contributing editor to Black’s Law Dictionary and teaches at the National Trial Advocacy College and National Litigation Academy. Key professional milestones include serving as trial counsel in Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network (1997 Supreme Court case) and clerking for federal judges. He is admitted to practice in New York and Virginia, and maintains active roles in legal associations like the Virginia Bar Association. His awards reflect sustained excellence in teaching, scholarship, and contributions to legal education.

Paul Dalyمشاهده پروفایل

استاد

• Administrative Law
• Public Law
• Constitutional Law
• +۳ مورد دیگر

Paul Daly is Professor and University Research Chair in Administrative Law & Governance at the University of Ottawa's Faculty of Law (Common Law Section), appointed in July 2019. Fluent in English and French, he maintains an active external role as part-time member of Canada's Environmental Protection Tribunal since 2019 and has held prior positions at the University of Cambridge and Université de Montréal, with visiting appointments at Harvard Law School, Université Paris II, Louvain Global College of Law, Trinity College Dublin, and Ireland's Law Reform Commission. His academic credentials include: BCL and LLM from University College Cork LLM from University of Pennsylvania Law School PhD from University of Cambridge Professor Daly's research centers on public law with exceptional focus on administrative law, examining judicial review standards, deference principles, and the constitutional foundations of administrative decision-making. His scholarship on the Vavilov framework and Doré duty has reshaped understanding of reasonableness review and fundamental rights application in administrative contexts. He pioneers interdisciplinary approaches connecting legal theory with practical governance challenges, emphasizing procedural fairness and accountability within the administrative state. Analysis of his publication trends reveals deep engagement with Canadian administrative law evolution while maintaining strong comparative perspectives across common law jurisdictions. His work consistently bridges doctrinal analysis with practical implications for tribunals, courts, and policymakers, particularly regarding standard of review methodologies and rights protection mechanisms. Scientific recognition includes: Lexpert Rising Stars Award (2023) for outstanding contributions to public law While specific doctoral students aren't documented, Professor Daly actively mentors through judicial training seminars and continuing legal education events nationwide. His scholarly influence extends through over 150 judicial citations internationally and frequent expert testimony. Grant funding details aren't specified, but his University Research Chair position signifies substantial institutional support for his administrative governance research program. His influential blog Administrative Law Matters serves as a central hub for global administrative law discourse, featuring case commentaries and theoretical analyses that directly inform judicial reasoning as evidenced by multiple Supreme Court of Canada citations.

Edward D. Cavanaghمشاهده پروفایل

استاد

• Antitrust Law
• Federal Procedure and Practice
• Complex Litigation
• +۳ مورد دیگر

Edward D. Cavanagh is a Professor of Law at St. John’s University School of Law, where he has taught since 1982. He holds a J.S.D. (1988) and LL.M. (1986) from Columbia Law School, a J.D. (1974) from Cornell Law School, and an A.B. in Economics (summa cum laude, 1971) from the University of Notre Dame. His research focuses on antitrust law, federal procedure, complex litigation, and law and economics. He has authored numerous articles on topics such as antitrust remedies, pleading standards, and civil litigation reform. Professor Cavanagh has held leadership roles in professional organizations, including co-chairing the ABA Antitrust Section’s Public Service Committee and serving on the New York State Bar Association’s Antitrust Section Executive Committee. He has also contributed to judicial reforms, including advising the Eastern District of New York on civil litigation rules. His publications explore the intersection of law, economics, and procedural fairness, emphasizing practical solutions to modern litigation challenges. Key Awards: Order of the Coif, Phi Beta Kappa, Cedric Major Scholarship (Cornell), Ford Foundation Scholarship, and Dean’s List (8 semesters). Professional Service: Reporter for the EDNY Committee on Civil Litigation, member of the ABA Antitrust Section Council, and advisor to federal judicial reform initiatives. His teaching spans antitrust law, civil procedure, conflict of laws, and federal practice. Recent scholarship addresses Twombly’s impact on pleading standards, the FTAIA’s role in foreign antitrust claims, and procedural reforms in federal courts.

Laura Dolbowمشاهده پروفایل

دانشیار

• Patent Law
• Health Law
• Administrative Law
• +۲ مورد دیگر

Laura Dolbow is an Associate Professor of Law at the University of Colorado Boulder, focusing on the intersection of patent law, health law, and administrative law. She holds a J.D. and B.A. from Vanderbilt University, where she won the Founder's Medal, and has held prestigious fellowships including the Sharswood Fellowship at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. Key research areas: Pharmaceutical patent systems, Medicare price negotiation, FDA regulatory frameworks, and constitutional implications of administrative review bars Award-winning scholar: Recipient of the Burton Award for Legal Writing (2018) and Gellhorn-Sargentich Essay Competition (2017) Her recent scholarship analyzes how patent portfolios delay generic drug competition and inflate prices, particularly in the context of the Inflation Reduction Act's Medicare negotiation program. She examines procedural challenges to agency guidance under the Administrative Procedure Act and the constitutional limits of patent takings claims. Prominent publications: Michigan Law Review , Vanderbilt Law Review , Administrative Law Review Major policy contributions: FDA approval of birth control pills, mifepristone access litigation, and sovereign immunity in pharmaceutical patents

George M. Cohenمشاهده پروفایل

استاد

• Contract Law
• Professional Responsibility
• Agency and Partnership
• +۴ مورد دیگر

George M. Cohen is a Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law, where he joined the faculty in 1993 as an associate professor and was promoted to full professor in 1995. He serves as a prominent scholar in legal ethics, contract law, and law and economics, teaching courses in contracts, professional responsibility, agency and partnership, and previously teaching antitrust and law and economics. Cohen earned his undergraduate degree summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa from Yale University. He went on to earn his J.D. in 1986 and a Ph.D. in economics in 1992, both from the University of Pennsylvania. During law school, he served as articles editor of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Prior to joining UVA, Cohen clerked for Judge Walter K. Stapleton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and taught at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law starting in 1988. Professor Cohen's research spans several interconnected areas of legal scholarship with a particular focus on the intersection of law, economics, and professional ethics. His work examines contract law through economic analysis, explores ethical dilemmas in legal practice, and investigates the theoretical foundations of agency and partnership law. He has made significant contributions to understanding how fault concepts shape contract law, the ethical responsibilities of lawyers in corporate settings, and the application of economic principles to traditional legal doctrines. His scholarship often bridges theoretical frameworks with practical applications in legal practice. Analysis of Cohen's recent publications reveals a consistent scholarly trajectory focusing on the evolving landscape of legal ethics in contemporary practice, particularly examining how traditional ethical frameworks respond to modern challenges like political interference in legal practice and the aftermath of financial crises. His work demonstrates a sophisticated integration of economic analysis with doctrinal legal scholarship, maintaining relevance across both theoretical and practical dimensions of law. Cohen has held significant leadership roles within the academic community, serving as chair of the UVA Faculty Senate from 2012-13. He has also contributed extensively to legal discourse through his role as an ethics consultant and expert for several law firms, demonstrating the practical impact of his scholarly work. His scholarship has appeared in prestigious law reviews including the Virginia Law Review, Fordham Law Review, and Michigan Law Review. Professor Cohen maintains an active scholarly presence with recent publications addressing contemporary legal challenges, including his 2024 analysis of Rudy Giuliani's disciplinary proceedings related to the 2020 election. His work continues to shape discussions on professional responsibility and the application of legal ethics in politically charged environments.

Garrett Westمشاهده پروفایل

دانشیار

• Torts
• Remedies
• Federal Courts
• +۴ مورد دیگر

Garrett West is an Associate Professor of Law at Yale Law School , focusing on torts, remedies, federal courts, administrative law, constitutional interpretation, and doctrinal coherence. He received his J.D. from Yale Law School in 2018 and a B.A. from Hillsdale College in 2015. Prior to joining Yale, he practiced appellate litigation in Washington, D.C., and clerked for Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain , Judge Thomas Griffith , and Justice Samuel Alito . Research Interests include integrating private law theory into public law, constitutional interpretation through doctrinal change, and analyzing the interplay between tort law and constitutional rights. His work addresses challenges in judicial oversight, administrative deference, and structural constitutional issues. Recent Scholarship explores the shadow docket, Bivens actions, Chevron waiver, congressional contempt, appointments clause distinctions, and constitutional torts. These publications reflect a trajectory toward refining judicial doctrines governing federal courts and administrative agencies. Contact: garrett.west@yale.edu | SSRN Profile

Sophia Z. Leeمشاهده پروفایل

استاد

• Legal History
• Administrative Law
• Constitutional Law
• +۷ مورد دیگر

Sophia Z. Lee is Dean and Bernard G. Segal Professor of Law at Penn Carey Law, with a secondary appointment in the Department of History at the University of Pennsylvania. A leading legal historian, she is renowned for her pioneering work in administrative constitutionalism and the intersection of civil rights, labor law, and constitutional development. Her research explores how administrative agencies shape constitutional meaning, particularly in areas of racial justice, employment rights, and privacy. She is the author of the influential book The Workplace Constitution from the New Deal to the New Right (2014), which traces the evolution of conservative legal thought and its impact on workplace rights. Her forthcoming work investigates the historical origins of privacy under the Fourth Amendment. The recent articles of Dean Lee reflect a sustained engagement with administrative law, civil rights, and constitutional history. Her scholarship consistently highlights how non-judicial actors—especially federal agencies—have played a crucial role in shaping constitutional norms, particularly in the realms of racial and labor justice. Themes of historical continuity, institutional power, and the dynamic interpretation of rights recur across her publications. She has been honored with Penn Carey Law’s top teaching awards, including the Harvey Levin, A. Leo Levin, and Robert A. Gorman awards for excellence in teaching. Her courses include Administrative Law, Employment Law, and seminars on racial justice and constitutional theory. Harvey Levin Award for Excellence in Teaching A. Leo Levin Award for Excellence in Teaching Robert A. Gorman Award for Excellence in Teaching Dean Lee advises no formal students listed in public materials but has significantly influenced legal scholarship through mentorship and leadership. She served as Deputy Dean from 2015 to 2017 and has held leadership roles in the American Society for Legal History and the Labor and Working Class History Association. Her research has been supported by fellowships including the Samuel I. Golieb Fellowship at NYU School of Law. She is actively involved in interdisciplinary legal scholarship and public engagement, contributing to platforms like The Regulatory Review and participating in national conversations on legal education and constitutional development.

Matthew Stephensonمشاهده پروفایل

استاد

• Administrative Law
• Legislation and Regulation
• Anti-Corruption Law
• +۱۶ مورد دیگر

Matthew Stephenson is Professor of Law at Harvard Law School , where he teaches administrative law, legislation and regulation, anti-corruption law, and the political economy of public law. He has been a faculty member since 2005, promoted to full Professor in 2010, and remains an active academic. He holds a J.D. and Ph.D. in Political Science from Harvard University and a B.A. from Harvard College. Assistant Professor of Law, Harvard Law School (2005–2010) Professor of Law, Harvard Law School (2010–Present) Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (2003–2004) Clerk, Supreme Court of the United States (2004–2005) His research centers on the application of positive political theory to public law, with a strong focus on administrative procedure, anti-corruption, judicial institutions, and separation of powers . He combines legal analysis with political science and economics to examine how institutions can be designed to promote integrity and effective governance. Recent publications reveal a consistent scholarly trajectory in constitutional law, administrative law, statutory interpretation, and anti-corruption . His work frequently analyzes institutional workarounds, the legitimacy of judicial doctrines, and innovative strategies for legislative and regulatory reform. He has published in top journals such as Harvard Law Review , Texas Law Review , and Yale Journal on Regulation , and has contributed to policy-oriented platforms including the Washington Post and Compliance Week . Notable scholarly contributions include: Critiques of the Major Questions Doctrine and textualism Proposals for reforming the Congressional Review Act Comparative studies on specialized anti-corruption courts Historical analysis of systemic corruption in the U.S. Conceptual frameworks for understanding corruption as a self-reinforcing trap He has advised on international anti-corruption initiatives, including serving as a principal co-drafter of a United Nations guide on national anti-corruption strategies. He is also the co-author of a leading casebook, Legislation and Regulation: Cases and Materials , and maintains an active public presence through the Global Anticorruption Blog and media commentary. His advising and grant activity is not detailed in the texts, but his collaborative research with scholars like Jody Freeman, John Manning, and Sofie Arjon Schütte suggests strong academic partnerships. He has no listed scientific awards in the provided materials. Professor Stephenson leads and contributes to research teams focused on corruption, institutional design, and public law reform. His work is associated with initiatives such as the Global Anticorruption Blog and the U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, indicating engagement with policy communities and interdisciplinary research networks.

Michael Sant'Ambrogioمشاهده پروفایل

استاد

• Administrative Law
• Regulatory Law
• Civil Procedure
• +۴ مورد دیگر

Michael Sant'Ambrogio serves as Dean and Red Cedar Distinguished Professor of Law at Michigan State University College of Law, appointed to this position on October 25, 2024, following ten months as Interim Dean. He has been a faculty member at MSU College of Law since 2011 and previously held leadership roles including Senior Associate Dean for Faculty and Academic Affairs and Associate Dean for Research. Sant'Ambrogio specializes in Administrative and Regulatory Law, Civil Procedure, Federal Courts, and Constitutional Law. His research focuses on institutional structures facilitating public participation in the federal regulatory process. Under his leadership, the College has implemented small 1-L sections, expanded experiential learning opportunities, and established a Public Defender Clinic serving clients across Michigan. His scholarship has been published in premier law journals including Columbia Law Review, Georgetown Law Journal, Iowa Law Review, George Washington Law Review, Vanderbilt Law Review, Washington University Law Review, William & Mary Law Review, and Yale Law Journal. Red Cedar Distinguished Professor Recommendations adopted by Administrative Conference of the United States (2016, 2018) Work cited by White House in guidance to Executive Branch departments Successful leadership of ABA re-accreditation process in 2022 As Senior Associate Dean, Sant'Ambrogio guided efforts to diversify adjunct faculty ranks, increased curricular offerings on technology and law, and improved bar exam preparation programs. He has served as a consultant for the Administrative Conference of the United States on public engagement with federal agency rulemaking and class actions in agency adjudication.

Steven J. Ballaمشاهده پروفایل

دانشیار

• American Politics
• Chinese Politics
• Regulation
• +۳ مورد دیگر

Steven J. Balla is an Associate Professor of Political Science, Public Policy, and International Affairs at George Washington University, and Co-Director of the George Washington Regulatory Studies Center. He holds a Ph.D. from Duke University and specializes in transparency, participation, and responsiveness in policymaking, with a focus on Greater China and the United States. His work includes congressional testimony on regulatory processes and Fulbright Scholarships at Peking University and Nankai University. Key research areas include polarization in public commenting, stakeholder participation in rulemaking, and comparative governance reforms between China and the U.S. Education: B.A. in Government and Economics (Franklin and Marshall College), M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science (Duke University). Courses taught include Politics of Regulation, Policy Analysis, and American Political Institutions. His publications analyze regulatory dynamics, governance reforms in China, and the impact of digital tools on policymaking. He has advised the Administrative Conference of the U.S. and contributed to the design of federal docket management systems. Scientific Awards: Fulbright Scholar (awarded for research at Peking University and Nankai University). Current projects explore Hong Kong policymaking responsiveness and Chinese government responsiveness to public participation. His work bridges comparative politics, regulatory studies, and digital governance innovations.

• European Union Law
• EU Constitutional Law
• Regulatory Governance
• +۹ مورد دیگر

Ellen Vos is a Full Professor and Key Domain Chair in European Law at the Faculty of Law, Maastricht University. She is affiliated with the Maastricht Centre for European Law (MCEL) and Studio Europa Maastricht, where she leads research on integration, differentiation, and flexibility in EU law and policy. Her work critically examines EU executive rulemaking, comitology, regulatory governance, and the interface between law and science in EU decision-making. Her research interests span a broad range of EU legal topics, with a strong focus on regulatory governance , differentiation and flexibility in EU law , comitology , judicial review of science-based measures , and EU constitutional architecture . She explores how EU institutions manage regulatory complexity, ensure democratic accountability, and respond to scientific uncertainty, particularly in areas like food safety and environmental policy. The trends in her recent publications reveal a sustained engagement with the constitutional and procedural foundations of EU executive power , especially through the evolution of comitology and delegated acts. Her work increasingly focuses on transparency, independence, and democratic legitimacy in EU agencies such as EFSA, and the role of courts in reviewing scientific expertise. The interdisciplinary nature of her research connects legal doctrine with governance theory, risk regulation, and policy analysis. Ellen Vos has been actively involved in organizing academic events, including the 28th Ius Commune Conference in 2024, and has contributed to PhD supervision and assessment committees. She has collaborated extensively with scholars such as Guido Bellenghi and others in the field of EU law. She has participated in numerous academic activities, including organizing workshops on responsible innovation and presenting on independence policies at EU agencies. Her work bridges academic scholarship with real-world policy challenges in the European Union.

• Lobbying
• Bureaucratic Politics
• Electoral Accountability
• +۳ مورد دیگر

Peter Bils is an Assistant Professor of Political Science and Economics at Vanderbilt University. His research focuses on lobbying, bureaucratic politics, electoral accountability, and international conflict. He holds a joint appointment in both the political science and economics departments. His work explores intersections between institutional design, policy-making processes, and strategic behavior in domestic and international settings. Key themes include: How ideological divides affect conflict dynamics Electorate responses to party platform shifts Executive branch decision-making under judicial constraints Lobbying strategies in polarized political environments Recent publications (2020-2025) reveal a focus on: Secret alliance formation mechanisms Revolving door effects in regulatory systems Status quo conflicts in international relations Amicus curiae strategies in high-court cases Bils has developed innovative frameworks for understanding: Policy extremism in repeated electoral cycles Multi-agency coordination failures Slow learning dynamics in military conflicts

• Bankruptcy Law
• Property Law
• Urban Planning
• +۳ مورد دیگر

Mary Jo Wiggins is a Professor at the University of San Diego School of Law , where her work bridges Bankruptcy Law , Property Law , and Urban Planning . She explores the interplay between property innovations and foundational legal doctrines , with a focus on zoning laws , racial dynamics in suburbs , and debtor-creditor relationships . Recent research includes analyzing trends in single-family housing ownership and the implications for municipal zoning . Long-term interests span critical race theory , intersectionality , and statutory interpretation . Key publications address bankruptcy ethics , fraudulent transfers , and suburban racial divides , reflecting her commitment to interdisciplinary legal scholarship. Her work often intersects with social justice and economic policy . Advising and grants are not explicitly mentioned in the provided text, but her extensive publications suggest mentorship and funding contributions. She has also written on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's legacy , highlighting her engagement with jurisprudential analysis .