Amy B. Cyphert is a Professor at West Virginia University College of Law, focusing on the intersection of Artificial Intelligence and legal ethics. Her research explores the implications of AI in legal practice, including bias, copyright, and access to justice. Key research areas include AI in Law, Legal Ethics, Technology Law, and Criminal Justice Reform Co-authored works on AI ethics in society and legal document analysis Her publications from 2020 to 2025 address topics such as algorithmic bias in criminal justice, restorative justice under Title IX, online surveillance of students, and AI-generated content. She has contributed to journals like UC Davis Law Review, Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, and Denver Law Review. Recent articles (2024-2025) emphasize ethical frameworks for AI tools like GPT-3, copyright challenges, and restorative justice models. Earlier work (2015-2021) examines racial disparities in education, recidivism prediction algorithms, and the impact of parental incarceration on children. Her scholarship underscores the need for legal professionals to address technological advancements' ethical and societal consequences, despite no listed awards or students in available data.
Martin H. Redish, the Louis and Harriet Ancel Professor of Law and Public Policy at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law, is a leading scholar in constitutional law, federal jurisdiction, civil procedure, and freedom of expression. His work has profoundly influenced First Amendment jurisprudence, particularly regarding commercial speech, and he has authored over 110 articles and 19 books. AB with highest honors in political science, University of Pennsylvania JD magna cum laude, Harvard University His research focuses on the intersection of constitutional principles and democratic governance, emphasizing judicial independence and the adversary system. He has been cited in 22 Supreme Court opinions and consistently ranked among the most-cited legal scholars. His recent publications address the role of economic power in democratic discourse and the paradoxes of judicial independence. Scientific awards include the Daniel J. Meltzer Award (2021) for path-breaking scholarship and teaching excellence. He has received multiple teaching honors at Northwestern, including the Robert Childress Memorial Award (three-time winner). As a consultant and expert witness, Redish has advised law firms, corporations, and congressional committees on constitutional law, class actions, and federal jurisdiction. His scholarly impact is evidenced by his inclusion in the top 20 legal scholars for judicial influence and frequent citations by the Institute for Scientific Information.
Harry Hobbs is an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS), where he has been employed since 2019. His academic position follows his progression from Lecturer to Associate Professor within the same institution. His educational qualifications include: PhD from University of New South Wales (2019) LLM from New York University (2015) BA/LLB (Hons) from Australian National University (2012) Professor Hobbs specializes in public law with a concentrated focus on Indigenous rights and international law. His research centers on Indigenous-State treaty making processes in Australia, examining how formal agreements can be established between Indigenous communities and government entities. He critically analyzes constitutional recognition frameworks, treaty negotiations across Australian jurisdictions, and truth-telling initiatives. His work often addresses the legal and political dimensions of implementing the Uluru Statement from the Heart, particularly regarding Voice, Treaty and Truth processes. His recent scholarly output demonstrates consistent engagement with contemporary legal issues affecting Indigenous Australians. His articles analyze state-level treaty processes in Victoria, Queensland, and other jurisdictions, examining both progress made and political challenges encountered. He also investigates how international legal frameworks might inform domestic treaty processes and assesses the constitutional validity of proposals for Indigenous recognition. Professor Hobbs is available for media requests, speaking engagements, consulting, research collaboration, and research supervision as indicated on his professional profile. His expertise makes him a valuable resource for understanding the complex legal landscape surrounding Indigenous recognition in Australia.
Joel Gora is a Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School, where he has taught since 1978. He specializes in constitutional law, civil liberties, and campaign finance law. He served as Associate Dean for Academic Affairs from 1993–1997 and 2002–2006. His expertise includes landmark cases like Buckley v. Valeo , which he argued before the U.S. Supreme Court, establishing foundational principles linking campaign finance and free speech. Prior to academia, he worked at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) for nearly a decade, handling over 100 Supreme Court cases. He has also served on the board of the New York Civil Liberties Union and various legal policy committees. Gora earned a B.A. from Pomona College and an LL.B. from Columbia Law School. His research focuses on First Amendment rights, election law, and media law, with a career spanning six decades. He plans to retire in 2025 after 60 years of constitutional advocacy. Education: B.A., Pomona College LL.B., Columbia Law School Research Interests: Gora’s work centers on the intersection of free speech, campaign finance, and civil liberties. He has authored numerous books and articles analyzing Supreme Court decisions and advocating for constitutional protections. His scholarship emphasizes the importance of the First Amendment in modern contexts, including digital media and political speech. Publications Overview: Gora’s recent works explore contemporary challenges to free speech, including the role of "super PACs" and the evolution of campaign finance laws. His articles often critique judicial trends and advocate for robust protections for political expression. The 2021 article Free Speech Still Matters underscores enduring tensions between government regulation and constitutional rights. Awards and Recognition: While no specific awards are listed, his contributions to civil liberties and constitutional law have been widely acknowledged through his impactful litigation and academic leadership. He has held named professorships, including the Les Fagen Professorship (though this title may apply to his role at Brooklyn Law School). Advising and Grants: Though no student advisees or grants are explicitly mentioned, his advocacy and litigation for the ACLU and NYCLU involved significant collaborative efforts. His work has shaped policies and legal frameworks impacting civil liberties nationwide. Labs/Teams: His involvement with the ACLU and NYCLU represents collaborative efforts in legal advocacy. He has also contributed to interdisciplinary initiatives at Brooklyn Law School, including the Public Service Law Center.
J. Stephen Clark is a Professor of Law at Albany Law School, affiliated with the University at Albany, SUNY. He joined the faculty in 2000 after private practice at Winston & Strawn in Chicago, specializing in employment-related appellate litigation. Prior roles include a visiting professorship at the University of Toledo College of Law and a law clerk position with the Chief Justice of the Indiana Supreme Court. His research focuses on employment discrimination, federalism, LGBTQ rights, and constitutional law. Education: B.A. from the University of Tennessee and J.D. from Yale Law School. His presentations explore topics like judicial federalism's impact on civil rights, legal frameworks for LGBTQ equality, and the intersection of constitutional principles with social justice issues. He has presented at venues including the Law and Society Association meetings and the National Lesbian and Gay Law Association conference. Clark’s work bridges theoretical analysis and practical legal challenges, particularly in areas of sexual orientation law, federal pre-emption doctrines, and the evolving landscape of civil rights protections. His scholarship critiques judicial approaches to federalism and advocates for equitable legal frameworks in employment and LGBTQ rights contexts. Advising and grants information is not explicitly detailed in the provided text. His academic contributions include courses in Business Law, Civil and Constitutional Rights, Conflicts of Law, Family Law, Labor and Employment Law, and Social Justice. No specific lab or team affiliations are noted.
Professor Derek T. Muller is a Professor of Law at the University of Notre Dame’s Notre Dame Law School. His expertise spans Election Law, Federal Courts, Legal Education, and Civil Procedure. He has authored over two dozen academic works, including influential pieces on election administration, voting rights, and judicial power. Muller’s research often intersects with constitutional law, focusing on federalism, election litigation, and the role of states in federal elections. Notable works include analyses of the Electoral College, the Electoral Count Act, and partisan gerrymandering. He has testified before Congress on election-related issues and contributed to the American Law Institute’s Restatement of Election Litigation. Muller teaches Election Law, Civil Procedure, Evidence, and Federal Courts, and co-authored a widely used Federal Courts casebook. His scholarship frequently appears in top law reviews, addressing contemporary legal challenges such as the ideological leanings of amicus briefs in high-profile Supreme Court cases. His research interests emphasize practical legal issues, such as reducing election litigation through procedural reforms and examining the interplay between state and federal electoral systems. Muller’s op-eds in major publications like the New York Times and Wall Street Journal highlight his engagement with public discourse on election integrity and constitutional governance. While no specific grants or labs are mentioned, his work reflects collaboration with institutions like the American Law Institute. His contributions to legal education include critiquing bar exam performance trends and advocating for transparent law school disclosures about affordability.
Professor Dorit Rubinstein Reiss is a leading scholar in vaccine law and policy at UC Law SF. She holds a Ph.D. in Jurisprudence and Social Policy from UC Berkeley (2007) and an LLB in Law and Political Science from Hebrew University of Jerusalem (1999). She teaches courses on torts, administrative law, public health law, and vaccine-related seminars. Education: Ph.D., Jurisprudence and Social Policy, University of California, Berkeley LLB., Law and Political Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Her research focuses on the legal and policy dimensions of vaccination, including mandates, liability, religious exemptions, and responses to anti-vaccine movements. Recent articles address pandemic-related legal challenges, misinformation, and regulatory frameworks for vaccine equity. Scientific Awards: None listed in the provided text. Professor Reiss collaborates with public health experts and contributes to media commentary on vaccine law. She has participated in panels on pandemic legal impacts and co-authored influential publications on vaccine liability, mandates, and ethical issues.
Kathy Kiely is the Lee Hills Chair in Free-Press Studies at the Missouri School of Journalism, University of Missouri, where she focuses on free expression, transparency, and the future of fact-based journalism. She has held faculty positions at Princeton University, American University, George Washington University, and the University of New Hampshire. As a veteran political reporter and editor, she brings real-world experience to her academic role, advocating for press freedom globally. Her educational background includes a bachelor’s degree from Princeton University, a master’s degree from American University, and a Knight Fellowship at Stanford University. Kiely's research and professional interests are centered on journalism as a public service, media literacy, and democratic accountability. She emphasizes the importance of free expression in sustaining democracy and works to increase public understanding of the value of a free press. Her interdisciplinary approach connects journalism with civic engagement, government transparency, and digital innovation. While no peer-reviewed academic articles are listed in the provided texts, her professional contributions are extensive and impactful, including organizing international press freedom fellowships, leading media literacy programs, and training journalists globally. Her work spans the U.S. and regions such as Niger, Afghanistan, and the Philippines, focusing on combating disinformation and supporting endangered journalists. 2024 Mel Carnahan Public Service Award Kiely mentors students and emerging journalists, including Lukas Parrish, a former student who received the Mel Carnahan Public Service Scholarship. Through the Lee Hills Chair, she has funded fellowships and grants that support persecuted journalists, such as Afghan journalist Zabihullah Ghazi and Pakistani reporter Ahmad Noorani. She has also collaborated on international training initiatives, including a 2022 program in Niger with colleagues from the Missouri School of Journalism. Kiely leads and participates in significant initiatives such as the Olive Lundgren Lecture on Press Freedom and the Friends of the Facts conference. She also supports KBIA-FM's 'Views of the News' program and has helped launch podcasts like 'Canned Peaches' through grant funding. Her work exemplifies the Missouri Method—hands-on, real-world journalism education and public service.
Ernie Walton serves as an Assistant Professor at Regent University School of Law in Virginia Beach, Virginia. His scholarly work focuses primarily on constitutional law, education law, and parental rights, with significant contributions to debates surrounding gender identity in schools, critical race theory in education, and religious freedom issues. Walton's research interests center on constitutional protections for parental rights in education, the intersection of First Amendment rights with school policies, and the historical foundations of educational freedom in America. His work frequently examines how constitutional principles apply to contemporary educational controversies including gender ideology in public schools, religious charter schools, and curriculum content disputes. He has developed a distinctive perspective connecting historical constitutional principles to modern educational conflicts. His publication record shows a clear trend toward increasingly focused work on parental rights and religious freedom in education. The most recent articles demonstrate deep engagement with legal challenges to school policies regarding gender transitions, parental notification requirements, and religious expression in charter schools. His scholarship combines historical analysis with contemporary legal arguments, often citing founding-era principles to address modern educational controversies. Walton has been actively involved in high-profile legal cases as an amicus curiae, particularly in cases involving parental rights and education policy. His legal briefs have addressed issues such as gender transition policies in public schools and the constitutional status of religious charter schools. As an advisor and legal commentator, Walton has specialized in constitutional challenges to public school policies that conflict with parental religious beliefs. His work has been influential in conservative legal circles addressing the boundaries of school authority versus parental rights in educational matters.
Anne-Marie Hakstian serves as Professor in the Department of Management within the School of Management at Salem State University, where she teaches foundational business law courses including Business Law I (BUS 252), Employment Law for Business (MGT 301), and the graduate-level Legal and Ethical Environment of Business (BUS 802N). Her academic credentials include a PhD in Law, Policy and Society from Northeastern University (dissertation: Racial and ethnic profiling in Massachusetts: An examination of police policy and practice ), a JD from The George Washington University Law School (1990), a BA in International Affairs from The George Washington University (1987), and a Certificat d'Etudes Politiques from Institut d'Etudes Politiques, Paris (1986). Her research centers on race and gender discrimination in employment , racial profiling , marketplace discrimination , and sexual assault prevention , examining the intersection of legal frameworks, business practices, and social justice. Her work employs interdisciplinary methodologies combining legal analysis, social psychology, and consumer behavior research to investigate systemic discrimination in retail and employment contexts. Her publication record reveals consistent scholarly engagement with consumer rights and discrimination issues since 2003, with notable expansion into liberation psychology perspectives and global marketplace ethics. The 2016 book Consumer Equality: Race and the American Marketplace represents a comprehensive synthesis of her research trajectory, while her award-winning 2011 article demonstrates significant influence in marketing ethics scholarship. Her scientific recognition includes: Thomas C. Kinnear Best Paper Award (2015) for Beyond Poverty: Social Justice in a Global Marketplace Professor Hakstian actively mentors students through Business Honors Thesis (BUS 603H) and Directed Study (BUS 875) courses, focusing on real-world applications of business law. Her research has been supported through academic collaborations with institutions including Northeastern University and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, resulting in extensive conference presentations at venues such as the American Marketing Association and Law and Society Association. She maintains strong community engagement through media interviews on consumer discrimination incidents and presentations to organizations including the NAACP and National Black MBA Association, translating academic research into practical frameworks for addressing marketplace inequities.
Bob Bauer is Professor of Practice and Distinguished Scholar in Residence at the New York University School of Law and co-director of NYU Law's Legislative and Regulatory Process Clinic. He has had a distinguished career in law and politics, serving as White House Counsel to President Obama from 2009 to 2011, and holding significant roles in presidential commissions under both Obama and Biden administrations. His educational background includes a JD from the University of Virginia School of Law (1976) and a BA from Harvard University, magna cum laude (1973). Bauer's research focuses on critical areas of American law and governance: Administrative Law - examining the structure and function of government agencies Constitutional Law and Theory - exploring foundational principles of American governance Election Law - addressing challenges to electoral integrity and process Legal Ethics - considering professional responsibilities in political contexts National Security Law and Practice - analyzing the intersection of security concerns and legal constraints Bauer's scholarly output demonstrates consistent engagement with pressing legal and political questions facing American democracy. His recent publications, particularly The Unraveling: Reflections on Politics Without Ethics and Democracy in Crisis (2024) and After Trump: Reconstructing the Presidency (2020), address fundamental challenges to democratic norms and institutions. His work often bridges theoretical legal analysis with practical political considerations, reflecting his extensive experience in government. Among his notable achievements: Listed in "America's Leading Political Law Lawyers" (Chambers USA, 2009) Recipient of the Burton Award for Legal Achievement for Legal Writing (Library of Congress, 2000) Bauer has served in significant advisory roles, including as co-chair of the Presidential Commission on Election Administration (2013) and the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court (2021). His practical experience informs his academic work, creating a valuable bridge between theory and practice in constitutional and election law. As a Contributing Editor of Lawfare, he regularly engages with contemporary legal debates through opinion pieces in major publications including the New York Times, Washington Post, and Atlantic. His career exemplifies the integration of scholarly inquiry with practical legal and political engagement, making significant contributions to understanding and strengthening American democratic institutions.
Cassandra Burke Robertson serves as the John Deaver Drinko - BakerHostetler Professor of Law at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, where she has been a faculty member since 2007 and directs the Center for Professional Ethics. Her academic career includes prior service as assistant solicitor general in the Office of the Texas Attorney General and a clerkship with the Texas Supreme Court. Robertson's scholarly work focuses on citizenship law, civil procedure, and legal ethics with transnational dimensions. Her publications appear in top journals including Columbia Law Review, NYU Law Review, Vanderbilt Law Review, and Texas Law Review, and have been cited by the U.S. Supreme Court and numerous federal and state courts. She teaches Civil Procedure, Professional Responsibility, Judicial Remedies, Law and Regulation of Autonomous Vehicles, Transnational Litigation, Secured Transactions, and Wills. Her recent scholarship addresses emerging legal challenges in autonomous vehicle regulation, litigation financing ecosystems, speech policy, and citizenship law. Articles like 'Litigating Partial Autonomy' (2024) and 'Optimizing the Litigation Funding Ecosystem' (2025) demonstrate her interdisciplinary approach connecting technology, ethics, and procedural law. Teacher of the Year (voted by graduating class) 1L Professor of the Year (voted by first-year students) Law Alumni Association Distinguished Teacher Award CWRU School of Law Distinguished Research Award Robertson actively shapes legal practice through her appointment to the Ohio Commission on Rules of Practice and Procedure by the Ohio Supreme Court. Formerly, she chaired the Uniform Law Commission's Study Committee on Third-Party Financing of Litigation. She also serves on the board of Maximum Accessible Housing of Ohio, demonstrating commitment to practical legal applications for social benefit. She holds a Juris Doctor with highest honors from the University of Texas at Austin (2002), complemented by Master's degrees in Middle Eastern Studies and Public Affairs (1998), and a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Washington (1993).
Catherine Hancock serves as Professor of Constitutional Law at Tulane University Law School, joining the faculty after a clerkship with Judge James L. Oakes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Her teaching portfolio includes Constitutional Law, First Amendment, Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Criminal Law, Federal Courts, and Law & Gender, with additional instruction in Comparative Criminal Procedure through Tulane's international programs in France and Toronto. Her research critically examines First Amendment boundaries in defamation and hate speech contexts, while her Constitutional Criminal Procedure work investigates police interrogation tactics, search protocols, privacy rights frameworks, and capital punishment jurisprudence. These scholarly pursuits are reflected in co-authored casebooks published by Aspen, LexisNexis, and West. Her distinguished recognition includes: Sumter Marks Award for scholarly achievement (2002) C. J. Morrow Research Professorship of Law (2004-2005) Three-time recipient of the Felix Frankfurter Distinguished Teaching Award (1992, 1998, 2005) Professor Hancock maintains a strong commitment to public service through pro bono representation, notably dedicating eight years as co-counsel for a death row inmate culminating in a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court argument. Her professional activities demonstrate integration of theoretical scholarship with practical legal advocacy.
S. Alan Childress is the Conrad Meyer III Professor of Civil Procedure at Tulane Law School , specializing in the legal profession, professional responsibility, appellate courts, torts, and evidence. His scholarship includes works on jurisdiction, emotional distress torts, First Amendment law, and Louisiana notary law. PhD, Jurisprudence & Social Policy (University of California, Berkeley, 1995) MA, Jurisprudence & Social Policy (University of California, Berkeley, 1986) Juris Doctor (Harvard University, 1982) BA, Political Science (University of Alabama, 1979) His research focuses on judicial and jury roles in constitutional adjudication, defamation, and procedural law. He co-authored Federal Standards of Review and contributed to the ABA Journal’s Blawg 100 Hall of Fame via The Legal Profession Blog . Notable publications include a 2010 annotated edition of Holmes’ The Common Law and a Louisiana notary law book series since 2020, reflecting interdisciplinary work in legal history, civil procedure, and state-specific jurisprudence.
Jennifer Gerarda Brown is a Professor of Law at Quinnipiac University School of Law , where she has been a faculty member since 1994 and served as dean from 2013 to 2024. She also held the interim executive vice president and provost role during the pandemic (2019–2020). Her research focuses on Alternative Dispute Resolution , Civil Procedure , and LGBTQ+ legal issues , with a strong emphasis on negotiation ethics and restorative justice . Education: AB from Bryn Mawr College, JD from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Her scholarly work bridges legal education reform and social problem-solving , including groundbreaking studies on apology in negotiation and privatizing non-discrimination policies . Over the past decade, she has led $13.5 million in fundraising for initiatives like the Bridge to Practice program and named spaces such as the Lynne L. Pantaleno Law Library . As dean, she expanded concentrations in cybersecurity law and international law , while increasing student body diversity from 17% to 27% underrepresented groups. Recent trends in her publications highlight interdisciplinary approaches to conflict resolution , including the 2025 article on empathy in negotiation and 2024 work on legislative responses to cultural conflicts . She has also explored mindfulness training for law students and wellness resources as integral to legal education. Her scientific recognition includes being named to NEBLSA’s 57 Most Influential Black Attorneys (2025). Scientific Awards: NEBLSA’s 57 Most Influential Black Attorneys Class of 2025 Brown's leadership legacy includes founding the Bridge to Practice program , establishing the Beginners’ Wisdom retreat , and advocating for student-centered legal training . She will return to full-time professorship in Spring 2025 after her sabbatical.
